|
 |
|
 |
RECENT CWDI
REPORTS
• CWDI/IFC Report on
Accelerating
Board
Diversity (2010)
• 2010 CWDI Report:
Women
Directors
in
the
Fortune
Global
200 • 2009 CWDI
Report: Women
Directors
in
Japan’s
100
Largest
Companies (Click here to order) |
COUNTRIES
WITH QUOTAS
 NORWAY
 SPAIN
 FRANCE (awaiting Fall 2010 vote)
 NETHERLANDS (awaiting Fall 2010 vote)
 DENMARK
 FINLAND
 ICELAND
 IRELAND
 SWITZERLAND
 Norway’s Minister for Children, Equality, and
Social Inclusion Audun Lysbakken and CWDI Chair Irene
Natividad at CWDI/IFC Roundtable
 Roundtable participants
SONY
Corporation’s Two
Women Board
Directors
 Sakie Fukushima
 Yukako Uchinaga
CWDI opens Johannesburg Stock Exchange
 2009
CWDI opens Toronto Stock Exchange
 2008
CWDI closes the NASDAQ Market
 2006
|
 |
 |
|
 |
I. WHY EUROPE WILL SURPASS THE U.S. IN CHANGING BOARD COMPOSITION
There is a quota tsunami sweeping Europe, and its impact will
forever change the faces of board directors in its top
companies. In a study released last month on
“Accelerating
Board Diversity”
in Beijing at the 2010 Global Summit of Women, CWDI reported on
current initiatives globally to increase women’s presence on
corporate boards including quota
legislation.
It all
began with Norway,
which
successfully
implemented a
quota law
in 2004
mandating 40%
of board
seats to
be allocated
for women
in all
its companies
within a
two year
period. Spain followed suit with a
similar law in 2007, but with a longer 8-year deadline. The
lower houses of the Dutch Parliament (2009) and the French Assembly
(2010) also passed quota laws, while Finland, Iceland, Ireland,
Switzerland and Denmark already have quotas in place for women
directors in government-owned companies There are now efforts
to expand quotas to publicly-listed corporations in Finland, while
Iceland had already done so this year. Even German cities such
as Berlin and Nuremberg have quotas in place for state-owned
companies in those cities. Deutsche Telekom and Daimler – two of the
largest German companies – have quotas in place for women in senior
management at 25% and 20%
respectively.
Why is
this trend happening? Because
it works.
While the U.S. percentage of women directors currently stands at
15.2%, Norway’s 44% women’s representation on boards exceeded its
own target of 40%. So, if the goal is simply to increase the
number of women on corporate boards more rapidly, then European
countries have found quotas to be effective. There is also a
tradition already in place for using quotas to improve women’s
presence in the Parliaments of Europe, so using this legislative
strategy in the private sector is just another aspect of arriving at
equity. Lastly, Europe has a larger number of companies that
are government-owned, so governments as shareholders have a larger
‘voice’ in board composition. (To order the CWDI report on
Accelerating
Board Diversity,
log on to www.globewomen.org, click to
CWDI. See International Herald
Tribune on this report – www.globewomen.org/summit/2010/Press/IHT.Article.5.27.htm
II. WHERE WOMEN ARE ON THE BOARDS OF THE 200 LARGEST COMPANIES IN THE WORLD
Over 3/4ths (77.5%) of the 200 largest companies globally now have
at least one female director on their board. That’s one of the
good news in the 2010
CWDI Report
on Women
Directors in
the Fortune
Global
200. The other good news
–there are
more large
companies with
two women
directors (58)
than those
with just
one (51).
TOP FIVE COMPANIES WITH HIGHEST PERCENTAGE OF WOMEN
DIRECTORS
This is the third report by CWDI on the Fortune Global 200, and the
bad news -- progress remains glacial.
The percentage
of women
directors in
the 200
largest
companies is
at
12.2%
in 2009,
a mere
1% increase
over
11.2%
in
2007. This means that men
still hold 87.8% of board seats in the world’s 200 largest
companies. The majority of companies with no female representation
are from Asia. (64.4%), although China has one company in the Top
Ten list with the highest percentage of women directors – China
Construction Bank with 29.4% of its board female. The leaders of
this list are Norway’s Statoil Company and U.S.-based Kraft
Corporation with 40% of their board seats held by women. (For
copies of the report, log on to www.globewomen.org, click to CWDI. See CNN Money article on this report –
www.globewomen.org/CWDI/2010%20Global/CNNMoneyArticle.html.)
III. CWDI/IFC PARTNERSHIP ON PROMOTING BOARD DIVERSITY
The International Finance Corporation, the private sector arm
of the World Bank, has partnered with CWDI to bring together all
research efforts on women directors globally, as well as all
initiatives to increase women’s presence on corporate boards. The
result is the report on Accelerating
Board Diversity
mentioned above. In addition, CWDI and IFC convened the
first-ever Roundtable
on Board
Diversity on March 26th in
Washington, D.C., which brought together key stakeholders involved
in this issue – government officials, board directors, researchers,
institutional shareholders and corporate governance
experts.
.
Norway’s
Minister for Children, Equality, and Social Inclusion Audun
Lysbakken presented on his country’s successful implementation of
the quota law mentioned above. Australia’s Federal Sex
Descrimination Commissioner Liz Broderick spoke of the Australian
Stock Exchange’s new requirement that member companies must
report on board diversity and to explain “why not” if diversity is
absent. SEC’s Rick Ferlauto explained the Commission’s equally
new ruling that board diversity must be reported on in U.S.
companies’ annual filings with the Commission. These were but
a few of initiatives shared for the first time in one forum. A
future Roundtable is planned to accelerate each country’s efforts
through these exchanges.
IV. ‘PROGRESS’ ON JAPAN’S CORPORATE BOARDS?
On November 11, 2009, CWDI released its 2009 Report on
Women Directors
in Japan’s
100 Largest
Companies. This was the second study
of Japanese women directors conducted by CWDI. The first was
11 years earlier, the release for which was followed by the
first-ever Colloquium for Japanese female directors held in
Tokyo. In 1998, only .2% of board seats were held by Japanese
women.
It will not
surprise anyone that there has been little ‘progress’. Currently,
there are
only 15
women directors
serving on
the boards
(or
1.4%)
of Japan’s
largest
companies, many of which carry brands that
are household names all over the world. Because the majority of
board seats in these companies are held by ‘inside’ directors or
senior executives, where women are so few or nonexistent, the
‘pipeline’ for women directors is very slim. All the women
directors are ‘outside’ or independent directors in these large
companies. Only Sony Corporation has two women serving on its
board. (For a copy of CWDI’s 2009 Japan report, log on to www.globewomen.org, click to CWDI.)
V. WHAT STOCK EXCHANGES AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMISSIONS ARE DOING TO TRACK BOARD DIVERSITY
As a way of being proactive and getting in front of legislative
mandates on board diversity, some countries' stock exchanges and
corporate governance commissions are including 'board diversity' as
a condition of being a listed company and as a necessary component
of good corporate governance.
Germany is the latest country to include in the
German Corporate Governance code a provision requiring each company
to design diversity goals for Management and Board and to present
them for discussion at shareholder meetings. There is a
principle of “comply and explain.” Spain, Finland, Sweden and
Belgium have similar provisions in their country’s corporate
governance codes – guidelines often followed by companies for
transparent and responsible
governance. Meanwhile, Spain
and Australia have stock exchanges which require information on
board diversity in listed companies’ annual filings. The
Australian Stock Exchange is going a step further in asking each
company for numbers of women on their boards, senior management and
overall employees in their annual filings. It also asks for
diversity targets for all three and progress in reaching
them.
Meanwhile, the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission has also added a new diversity disclosure
requirement. Companies must now disclose whether
and if so, how, their nominating
committees consider diversity in identifying nominees for
director. “All of these provisions are steps in the right
direction,” states CWDI Chair Irene Natividad, “but they require
commitment to promote
compliance.”
***************** Since 1997, Corporate Women
Directors International has conducted research to provide baseline
data on women board directors in different countries, regions, and
industries. CWDI also convenes women directors in different
parts of the world on issues of corporate governance. For more
information, go to www.globewomen.org.
|
|