1992 Global Summit of Women Press 


July 13, 1992, CITY EDITION


“Forum urges governments to act on gender equality”

By Mary Cummins, Women's Affairs Correspondent

URGENT research into diseases which are only beginning to affect women since the increase in their numbers in the workplace must be carried out as a priority, Senator Joaquima Alemany Roca, a Spanish politician, told delegates to the Global Forum of Women in Dublin at the weekend. In spite of scientific and social progress, women's health continued to be a neglected field in terms of money and medical practice, she added. They were suffering from specific problems and needs which required specific resolution. Over the weekend, which included musical evening at Trinity College on Saturday night, delegates and speakers covered subjects such as women and the arts, new visions of economic leadership , the media and rethinking food "as a macro-economic issue". At the conclusion of the forum yesterday Ms Betty Friedan announced that a third global summit meeting for women would take place in Barcelona in two years' time. Ms Friedan chaired the final session in the absence of the summit director, Ms Irene Natividad, who had already left to run a women's section of the Democratic Party convention in New York this week, a spokeswoman said. The Dublin summit wrapped up the four-day "New Visions of Leadership" meeting with some moderate recommendations. These had emanated from a variety of sessions ranging from issues on crisis in world leadership, women in private-sector leadership, health, the arts, work and family, the economy and the media. The proposals, which are already defined policies of most women in politics and other organisations, included at least 40/60 representation at all decision-making levels. They urged governments to integrate progressive affirmative action" to achieve gender equality. They sought to activate the woman's vote for change in their lives and encouraged "the setting up of a global network to monitor how the media generally cover women, their issues and their lives". They also demanded that governments should not impinge on women's personal decisions about family planning or having abortions. Speaking on "Media and the Changing Image of Women", on Saturday, Ms Kathy Bonk, president of Communications Consortium in the US, declared that "ownership of newspapers and other outlets should now be the vision for women". She believed that this ambition represented the only seed of hope for women since they would never be able to get an accurate, fair and equal coverage while these businesses were owned and controlled by men. Ms Mitsuko Shimomura, editor-in-chief of the Asahi Journal in Japan, described the difficulties and triumphs she had encountered since getting a senior job over the heads of four men. The problems had included the lack of any role model and "establishing a new kind of female leadership". She had found it a great help in working with career women in other jobs and in helping to get women's issues taken "out of the women's pages". She cited some instances where she had managed to change the perception that women's issues did not constitute political coverage. Several speakers declared that it is "commercial interests" which will change. newspapers and other media coverage of women's issues. Ms Jennie Buckner, vice- president for news at KnightRidder, a US media organisation, declared that she had seen the stirrings of serious change because newspapers were "trying to win back women." It had been discovered that if as many women as men read newspapers, publications would have an increase of some four million readers a day. Now "she said - many newspapers were conducting analyses into what women wanted to read. .and into their opinions about how the news was presented. It had been shown that many women believed that much  newspaper coverage had no apparent relevance to their lives". Also, she added, they had "failed to connect" with the lavish fashion spreads of expensive clothes modelled by women whose bodies did not seem "real" to the readers. Ms Friedan outlined the findings of a US survey which showed that 85 per cent of reports and picture coverage on the front pages of several newspapers were about men - with the remaining 15 per cent given to women. The survey had found that this was not the result of a conspiracy among men in journalism. It reflected "a blind spot", she said, "which reflected and shaped the status of women in the larger society". During the Anita Hill/Clarence Thomas hearings, further studies had shown that only one in 10 of the public asked for their opinion on the issue was a woman. This had continued during the recent breast-implants scandal, and when it was pointed out, the managers of television stations and newspapers doubled this ratio. Ms Danielle Debbas, a journalist from Canada, described how, in order to change advertising policies which portrayed women in additional and unrealistic roles", they had managed to establish an annual award for the most sexist advertisement.  This had first hit a product called "Mr Clean", which had been damaged commercially and embarrassed by the publicity when its manufacturers won the award. Within weeks they were seeking advice as to how they should portray women. Ms Debbas said the problem had disappeared in quite a short time. "We must realise we have economic clout even if we are not individually rich", she said. During this session, The Irish Times and specifically this reporter were strongly attacked from the platform and the floor for writing a piece in last Saturday's newspaper which gave an account of some of the organisational problems that were evident at the summit.

Copyright © 2009-2010 Globewomen. All rights reserved. "Corporate Women Directors International",
"Global Summit of Women" and "Global Diversity" are trademarks of GlobeWomen.

Any Questions & Comments, contact GlobeWomen at summit@globewomen.comOr, write to us:
GlobeWomen, Inc./ 1100 G St., Ste. 700/ Washington, DC 20005/ USA


[GlobeWomen Home] [CWDI] [Consortium to End Cervical Cancer] [Global Diversity] [Summit]